VAISHNAVAS OF ISKCON AND THE PROTECTION OF THEIR OWN IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DISCUSSIONS ON HINDUISM

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Yu. Fil

  M. Karpitsky

Abstract

The article describes the main methodological difficulties in Hindu Studies and looks at the Bhagavad Gita as it is book trial in Tomsk (Russian Federation) in 2011–2012 as the case-study of actuality and practical significance of theoretical bases and statements of the discipline. Among the groups of methodological problems extracted by the authors (identity, terminological, classificatory and practical) the first one is the most up to date. It concerns with the questions of identification of essential features of Hinduism, the reasons to embrace numerous cults and traditions of India into one religion, to find the “Hinduism nucleus” and the time of its emergence and deve-lopment. Article also points out two approaches for studying Hinduism – centralist and pluralist, analyzing strengths and weaknesses of both.
On Bhagavad Gita as it is book trial and other events connected to the trial the numerous principal questions were discussed. The main one was about International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) attachment to Hinduism and Indian culture in general. During the discussion the argument about non-Vedic origin of Krishna’s cult was refuted. This argument leaves outside Hinduism not only ISKCON, but whole five hundred years old tradition of Gaudiya Vaishnavism. It was found out why it is incorrect to ask whether Bhagavad Gita as it is and Bhagavad Gita are different books or one and the same book and deconstructed many stereotypes about Hinduism and Hindu people like the stereotype that to be a Hindu a person has to be born in Hindu family or the one that caste system is the essential feature for Hinduism. The discussions at the Court and during the conference proved that the centralist approach in Hindu Studies is more productive in the social practice. The trial not only provoked Vaishnavas of ISKCON to defend their identity but also led to better understanding of ISKCON connection with the tradition of Hinduism and its role in Indian culture.

How to Cite

Fil, Y., & Karpitsky, M. (2021). VAISHNAVAS OF ISKCON AND THE PROTECTION OF THEIR OWN IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DISCUSSIONS ON HINDUISM. The World of the Orient, (1 (110), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2021.01.102
Article views: 67 | PDF Downloads: 39

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Bhagavad Gita, Bhagavad Gita as it is, Gaudiya Vaishnavism, Hinduism, Indology, International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), Vaishnavism

References

Аванесов С. С., Свистунов В. Н., Наумов В. Г. Заключение комплексной комиссионной экспертизы от 25.10.2010 / Копия, заверено, помощник прокурора г. Томска Осипова М. С., 2010.

Глушкова И. П. Способы существования сакрального индусского текста и образ России в Индии // Вестник Томского государственного университета. История, 2013, № 4 (24).

Дандекар Р. Н. От Вед к индуизму. Эволюционирующая мифология / Составитель Я. В. Васильков. Ответственный редактор Г. М. Бонгард-Левин. Пер. с англ. К. П. Лукьяненко. Москва, 2002.

Древо индуизма. Москва, 1999.

Жарчинская К., Чубирко Н. Ракетами и вертолетами Индию не задобрить // Дом Прабхупады в Москве, 2012, № 3.

Карпицкий Н. Н., Глушкова И. П., Хазанов О. В. и др. Резолюция научной конференции “Бхагавад-гита в истории и в современном обществе” // Бхагавад-гита в истории и в современном обществе: Материалы V Всероссийской научной конференции с межд. уч. Томск, 2012.

Карпицкий Н. Н., Филькин К. Н., Хазанов О. В. О конференции “Бхагавад-гита в истории и в современном обществе” // Вестник Томского государственного университета. История, 2013, № 4 (24).

Тимощук А. С., Филькин К. Н. Казус суда над Бхагавад-гитой Свами Прабхупады: генезис, анализ, реакция общественности и медиа // Вестник Томского государственного университета. История, 2013, № 4 (24).

фон Штитенкрон Г. О природе индуизма. О правильном употреблении обманчивого термина // Древо индуизма. Москва, 1999.

Davis R. H. Introduction. A Brief History of Religions in India. Religions of India in Practice / Ed. Donald S. Lopez, Jr. Princeton, New Jersey, 1995.

Dumont L. Homo Hierarchicus. The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago and London, 1980.

Elst K. Hindu Dharma and the Culture Wars. New Delhi, 2019.

Organ T. W. Hinduism. Its Historical Development. New York, 1974.

Radhakrishnan S. The Hindu View of Life. Harper Element, 2015.

Sharma A. What is Hinduism // The Study of Hiduism. University of Southern California Press, 2003.

REFERENCES

Avanesov S. S., Svistunov V. N. and Naumov V. G. (2010), Zaklyucheniye kompleksnoy komissionnoy ekspertizy ot 25.10.2010, Kopiya, zavereno, pomoshchnik prokurora g. Tomska Osipova M. S. (In Russian).

Glushkova I. P. (2013), “Sposoby sushchestvovaniya sakral’nogo indusskogo teksta i obraz Rossii v Indii”, Tomsk State University Journal. History, No. 4 (24), pp. 138–145. (In Russian).

Drevo induizma (1999), Izdatel’skaya firma “Vostochnaya literatura” RAN, Moscow. (In Russian).

Zharchinskaya K. and Chubirko N. (2012), “Raketami i vertoletami Indiyu ne zadobrit’ ”, in Dom Prabkhupady v Moskve, No. 3, p. 9. (In Russian).

Dandekar R. N. (2002), Ot Ved k induizmu. Evolyutsioniruyushchaya mifologiya, Compl. by Ya. V. Vasil’kov, Transl. from English by K. P. Luk’yanenko, “Vostochnaya literaturа”, Moscow. (In Russian).

Karpitskiy N. N., Glushkova I. P., Khazanov O. V. at all (2012), “Rezolyutsiya nauchnoy konferentsii ‘Bkhagavad-gita v istorii i v sovremennom obshchestve’ ”, in Bkhagavad-gita v istorii i v sovremennom obshchestve: Materialy V Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii s mezhd. uch., TPU, Tomsk, pp. 400–402. (In Russian).

Karpitskiy N. N., Fil’kin K. N. and Khazanov O. V. (2013), “O konferentsii ‘Bkhagavad-gita v istorii i v sovremennom obshchestve’ ”, Tomsk State University Journal. History, No. 4 (24), pp. 150–152. (In Russian).

Timoshchuk A. S. and Fil’kin K. N. (2013), “Kazus suda nad Bkhagavad-gitoy Svami Prabkhupady: genezis, analiz, reaktsiya obshchestvennosti i media”, Tomsk State University Journal. History, No. 4 (24), pp. 178–184. (In Russian).

fon Shtitenkron G. (1999) “O prirode induizma. O pravil’nom upotreblenii obmanchivogo termina”, in Drevo induizma, Izdatel’skaya firma “Vostochnaya literatura” RAN, Moscow. (In Russian).

Davis R. H. (1995), Introduction. A Brief History of Religions in India. Religions of India in Practice, Donald S. Lopez, Jr. (ed.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

Dumont L. (1980), Homo Hierarchicus. The Caste System and Its Implications, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

Elst K. (2019), Hindu Dharma and the Culture Wars, Rupa, New Delhi.

Organ T. W. (1974), Hinduism. Its Historical Development, Woodbory, New York.

Radhakrishnan S. (2015), The Hindu View of Life, Harper Element.

Sharma A. (2003), “What is Hinduism”, in The Study of Hiduism, University of Southern California Press, pp. 1–19.

Most read articles by the same author(s)